Categories
Uncategorized

Ahmad Al Aliwi Alissa kills 10

Ahmad Al Aliwi Alissa kills 10 on Monday March 22, 2021. We know he wasn’t white, because the news didn’t say “white man kills 10 people.” In fact, we don’t know what color he was.

UPDATED:3/24/2021

Appears CNN had another reporter on the scene to let us know what she saw. Here’s what she said…

We know that the suspect is in custody. He was injured. They have not released any details about who he was. But we did see footage of a white gentl… uh… a WHITE MAN. He was wearing shorts, no shoes, no shirt. He seemed to be bleeding down his leg. He was handcuffed.

https://www.facebook.com/TuckerCarlsonTonight/videos/788820695095054/

On the very next day when she found out that it was a Muslim:

Vice-President Kamala Harris’ niece:

When she found out it was a Muslim she then tweeted:

Former ATF AGENT IN CHARGE – Jim Kavanaugh stated – before it was known that the murderer was a Muslims, “Is this just a guy copycatting the hate crime, the vicious hate crime in Atlanta?” in reference to Alissa.

You judge for yourself as to how biased or unbiased the media is.

Return to original write-up:

Unlike the killings last week where the Washington Examiner reported on CNN’s broadcast: 1

During one of his cute "reality check" segments on Thursday, CNN's John Avlon claimed — without evidence! — that "we don't yet know exactly what motivated" the suspect, 21-year-old Robert Long.

Actually, we do know. Atlanta-area law enforcement have said that Long, whose shooting spree is on camera and whose identity was alerted to authorities by his own parents, confessed to the killings and that he attributed his motive to a sex addiction that he was trying to resolve by eliminating the places he had frequented to satisfy it.

The media don't like this set of facts. Because six of the eight victims were of Asian descent, Avlon couldn't stop from trying to make it about race, thus making it about former President Trump, and thus linking it to the ever elusive "white supremacy."

It's nonsense. The irony is that Long appears to have been motivated by the very sort of religious fanaticism that the media would have previously found very interesting, especially because Long isn't a Muslim.

But yesterday we have a Muslim who killed 10 people and we just have a name and no details about race, religion, motive.

CNN and most other journalists were quick insinuate "white supremacy" last week. I have some "friend" on Facebook who immediately went to "Stop Asian Hate." Here is more from CNN last week.

And preliminary information indicates that the killings — of six Asian people and two White people — may not have been racially motivated, but instead could relate to the suspect’s claim of a potential sex addiction, Cherokee County Sheriff Frank Reynolds said at the joint news conference…
2

AND WENT ON TO SAY

Because of the victims’ backgrounds, some public officials had raised fears before Wednesday’s police news conference that ethnicity had come into play, amid rising concerns nationwide about anti-Asian violence during the coronavirus pandemic.

But when it comes to yesterday's shooting of 10 people - NOT ONE PEEP about motive. No thoughts. NOTHING. Hypocrisy at it's best - or worst, depending on how you look at it.

“(It is) premature to draw any conclusions (about motive) at this point in time,” FBI special agent in charge Michael Schneider said. *AND* A suspect is in custody, Boulder Police Chief Maris Herold said, but authorities did not share any information on his identity, the type of weapon used or any possible motive.

On Alissa's facebook page: “Yeah if these racist islamophobic people would stop hacking my phone and let me have a normal life I probably could,” he posted in July 2019. 3

Other reference to a post on Facebook - same source:

"He shared an article rebuking Donald Trump’s stance on immigration, but also posted about his own opposition to gay marriage and abortion."

A tragic event occurred, life was lost and these are the details we have at this time. It's really a shame that most of our media is so biased against a particular race here in the United States.

Categories
Biden Fact Checking

Biden’s first week of Executive Orders

This is what is important to Biden.

These are direct quotes from one of the Executive Orders itself.

Process this…

“Section 1.  Policy.  Every person should be treated with respect and dignity and should be able to live without fear, no matter who they are or whom they love.  Children should be able to learn without worrying about whether they will be denied access to the restroom, the locker room, or school sports.”

“In Bostock v. Clayton County, 590 U.S. ___ (2020), the Supreme Court held that Title VII’s prohibition on discrimination “because of . . . sex” covers discrimination on the basis of gender identity and sexual orientation.  Under Bostock‘s reasoning, laws that prohibit sex discrimination — including Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended (20 U.S.C. 1681 et seq.), the Fair Housing Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 3601 et seq.), and section 412 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended (8 U.S.C. 1522), along with their respective implementing regulations — prohibit discrimination on the basis of gender identity or sexual orientation, so long as the laws do not contain sufficient indications to the contrary.”

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2021/01/20/executive-order-preventing-and-combating-discrimination-on-basis-of-gender-identity-or-sexual-orientation/

Categories
Biden Fact Checking

Inoculating 100 million people in 100 days – Biden

Biden Promises 100 Million Covid-19 Vaccinations In First 100 Days, Warning That Trump’s Approach Would Take ‘Years’ – Forbes.com – December 29, 2020 1

The article went on to say “President-elect Joe Biden said Tuesday that the Trump Administration’s efforts to vaccinate millions of American people against Covid-19 are falling “far behind” what is needed to control the pandemic, pledging to invoke the Defense Production Act and launch vaccine education campaigns to accelerate the process and deliver 100 million vaccinations in his first 100 days in office.”

This would be huge. I think we need to celebrate Biden right now, because as Biden says, he clearly has a vision that Trump can’t match.

Yesterday on C-Span3, reported by the NYPost.com – Biden was asked, “shouldn’t you set the bar higher, that’s pretty much where we are right now?” So, the question is, if his plan of 100 million people in 100 days was a goal that was set too low.

‘When I announced it, you all said it’s not possible,’ he snapped. ‘Come on, gimme a break, man! It’s a good start.’ – President Joe Biden [enf_note]https://nypost.com/2021/01/21/biden-rebukes-white-house-reporter-for-covid-19-question/[/efn_note]

As of this morning CBS News quoted the following

Fauci said another difference between the two administration’s is Mr. Biden’s commitment to honesty.2

&

Psaki, who served as White House communications director under President Barack Obama and as a spokesperson at the State Department, told reporters during her first briefing on Wednesday that she and Mr. Biden discussed prior to his inauguration the “importance of bringing truth and transparency back to the briefing room.”3

But this is her hypocrisy… when she was called out, that Trump had already delivered on 1 million inoculations a day! Psaki makes excuses. Trump just delivered!

https://youtu.be/PpFCdu4s05w
According to Psaki, the Trump administration was given 36 million vaccine doses and administered a total of about 17 million shots, for a rate of fewer than 500,000 shots a day. ‘What we are proposing is to double that to about 1 million shots per day,’ she said, adding that the Biden team has been forming its plan to achieve this milestone ‘for some time.’4

Less than 500,000 shots a day. In the last month+ if you average across every day, including the first day where a few hundred were inoculated, it averages to 500,000 shots a day. As of December 23, 2020 – only 1 million had been inoculated. 5

Since then, under Trump’s administration, we got up to 1 million inoculations in one day as of last week.

Process this “As of Wednesday, nearly 29.4 million doses had been shipped to all 50 states and all U.S. territories. Of those, just 10.3 million — about 30% — had actually been used, CDC data shows.”6 What this means is that there are 19 days worth of doses to deliver left. Keep that same delivery pattern that Trump was up to and we have your 100 days – 100,000,000 inoculations. Biden’s promise. Trump’s delivery.

Even WebMD.com on January 20, 2021 posted the following article that was titled the following “For Biden, 100 Million Vaccinations in 100 Days Not Easy” and here is a clip of what it said – “Now, during a once-in-a-century pandemic, incoming President Joe Biden has promised to provide 100 million covid-19 vaccinations in his first 100 days in office. ‘This team will help get … at least 100 million covid vaccine shots into the arms of the American people in the first 100 days,” Biden said during a Dec. 8 news conference introducing key members of his health team.’ 7

So – GO BIDEN… Just don’t screw up what President Donald J. Trump delivered on.

Categories
Media Fact Checking

Antifa or not Antifa at the Capitol riot?

John Sullivan himself has video and says that he was at the Capitol riot in D.C..

When he was asked if he was a member of antifa, as he has used the hashtag in his social media posts, Sullivan said he understands where there could be confusion.

“If people are saying I’m antifa, as far as a terrorist organization, I’m not,” he said. “Am I anti-fascist? We all are anti-fascist. And that’s what we should all strive for being. I have my own organization, Insurgence USA, and that’s what it is for. That’s really what it is.” 1

“Gaetz, other Republicans baselessly claim Antifa was involved” – CNBC2

FBI says “No indication” that antifa took part in U.S. Capitol riot – CNBC 3

Place the blame where it belongs. Trump’s rabid supporters, not antifa, stormed the Capitol. – Suzette Hackney – USA TODAY 4

Scoop: Trump falsely blames Antifa for Capitol insurrection 5

The media goes on and on and on with the same narrative. NO ANTIFA. ALL TRUMP’S INCITEMENT.

Is this true??? I think we need to define Antifa before we can really evaluate these assertions.

Quick Google search on “What is Antifa?” and this is one of the top listings today.

This is what most media is reporting – that Antifa is a “loose network of demonstrators to counter fascism and racism…”

Enter John Sullivan…

[John Sullivan]A Utah activist who faces criminal charges in connection with a Provo protest he organized in June said he attended a pro-Trump rally that turned into a violent attack on the U.S. Capitol in order to see “the truth” about the protests for himself and the organization he represents.

The article continues on…

Sullivan, who is the founder of Insurgence USA, a social justice group that calls itself ANTI-FASCIST and protests police brutality, was detained by Washington police for about an hour and a half Thursday night, a day after he talked to local and national media about what he witnessed Wednesday.

We just heard from John’s site itself that says “Anti-Fascist” but not AntiFA. So, here is what the actual word Antifa means, by another Google search:

John Sullivan says he was there and had video of Ashli Babbitt who was killed in the incident.

After making his way inside the Capitol during the riot, Sullivan said he witnessed the shooting death of protester Ashli Babbitt, and the Twitter account for Insurgence USA retweeted video from someone with Sullivan that shows the shooting and the aftermath.

“I have video of it,” he said, describing in detail seeing the flash of the gun, the bullet strike Babbitt, and Babbitt’s reaction as she died there on the floor. “I am hesitant to post it. … It’s something I have to take in. I hope that people get a grasp of that situation. Whoever shot her, maybe should be held accountable. I guess that’s up to the law to decide.”

He claims Babbitt was the first one to try and get inside what he believes was the House chamber.

John was there. He was near the frontline of this ordeal, by his own account.

Throughout the video Sullivan can be heard telling police that they shouldn’t try to stop them from going different places because he doesn’t want them to get hurt. He appears to take his gas mask off at one point, but he is not shown in his own video except for a few seconds of an 18-minute video that has now been removed from his social media accounts.

As we started with, John himself states that he is “anti-fascist.” but there is more to it.

On Friday, Sullivan acknowledged that he was afraid at some points, but he denies trying to incite violence. In fact, he insists he was only trying to diffuse situations he saw as potentially volatile.

BUT…

Sullivan, 26, faces two criminal charges stemming from a protest he organized in Provo last June.
Charging documents say Sullivan recorded several hours of the protest and is seen in the recordings “kicking vehicles and threatening drivers” and directing protesters to block intersections. During that protest, a Provo man, 60, was shot in the elbow after protesters blocked his vehicle. Sullivan later admitted to police that he knew who the gunman was but failed to report it to authorities, according to the charges.

Let’s just end with this and you be the judge.

But some of the 40-minute video he posted to his social media sites contradicts his assertion that he and another woman were “only filming” the actions and not participating as he can be heard in the video encouraging people to join them as they push their way through police barricades.
When asked about some of the things he said during the 40-minute video, he said, “When you’re in a massive crowd like that, you have to blend in.” – John Sullivan – Insurgence USA – #Antifa
Categories
Cause for Concern

Not your normal “Summer camp” for Republican children?

Getting people “numb” to the idea. First, it’s a PBS staff attorney, then it’s representatives in Congress and by the time anyone knows what’s happening – “they” start carting Republican kids away… or worse. Just going to share the facts on this one. You decide. This seems to be getting a lot of publications and people are talking about it and saying, “why not?”

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/pbs-lawyer-seen-on-video-calling-for-children-of-republicans-to-be-put-in-reducation-camps/ar-BB1cH4Mn?fbclid=IwAR0qdt0fOwex1kSJIkn8pht8TiWbtvjX_StGq0VLvyPNiODnbHGqcZ9D2wQ
Original Location: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/pbs-trump-republicans-retribution?utm_source=msn&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=msn_feed
Categories
Media Fact Checking

Melania…”Opportunity to portray herself as a victim” – The Guardian

If The Guardian is your new source, these are the facts…

  • Melania Trump broke her silence on the attack on the Capitol on Monday – to issue a statement saying that she honored all those who died, including four supporters of her husband, who incited the mob to violent action. 1

Melania’s statement says “…my heart goes out to” 4 people by name “and the Capitol Police Officers” – both by name. Then she said, “I pray for their families comfort and strength during this difficult time.” She didn’t mention they were supporters of her husband and she didn’t mention that they were incited to violence. That was all added as literary license by Martin Pengelly in New York as listed in the post.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/jan/11/melania-trump-capitol-attack
  • …she also used the opportunity to portray herself as a victim, saying the shocking and violent attack on one of the hearts of American democracy had led to “salacious gossip, unwarranted personal attacks and false misleading accusations” about her.

Make no mistake, Melania is no victim. This is exactly what she said, “I am disappointed and disheartened with what happened last week. I find it shameful that surrounding these tragic events there has been salacious gossip, unwarranted personal attacks, and false misleading accusations on me – from people who are looking to be relevant and have an agenda. This time is solely about healing our country and its citizens. It should not be used for personal gain. Our Nation must heal in a civil manner. Make no mistake about it, I absolutely condemn the violence that has occurred on our Nation’s Capitol. Violence is never acceptable.” 2 How about let’s just let her words stand, rather than this Martin guy trying to obtain personal gain with his op-ed.

  • Donald Trump continues to refuse to admit the reality of his electoral defeat by Joe Biden, although he has conceded that he will leave office on 20 January.

Mixture of truth and fiction. “Refuse to admit the reality” is what Martin seems to want us to believe. but then Martin takes it one step further “although he has conceded that he will leave office on 20 January.” Cite your sources Martin. The word “concede” has not passed the lips of Trump. You are entitled to your own opinions, but you are not entitled to your own facts.

Categories
Media Fact Checking

Texas HB 196 – cited to “Repeal the Castle Law”

This is the report online as to what Terry Meza – Democrat from Irving, Texas has said:

In Texas, State Representative Terry Meza (D-Irving) has introduced HB196. Her bill would repeal the state’s “castle doctrine.” This doctrine allows a homeowner to use deadly force against an armed intruder who breaks into his home.
Now listen to what she has to say…
“I’m not saying that stealing is okay,” Meza explained. “All I’m saying is that it doesn’t warrant a death penalty. Thieves only carry weapons for self-protection and to provide the householder an incentive to cooperate. They just want to get their loot and get away. When the resident tries to resist is when people get hurt. If only one side is armed fewer people will be killed.”
Meza was quick to reassure that her bill “would not totally prevent homeowners from defending themselves. Under the new law the homeowner’s obligation is to flee the home at the first sign of intrusion. If fleeing is not possible he must cooperate with the intruder. But if violence breaks out it is the homeowner’s responsibility to make sure no one gets hurt. The best way to achieve this is to use the minimum non-lethal force possible because intruders will be able to sue for any injuries they receive at the hands of the homeowner.”
“In most instances the thief needs the money more than the homeowner does,” Meza reasoned. “The homeowner’s insurance we reimburse his losses. On balance, the transfer of property is likely to lead to a more equitable distribution of wealth. If my bill can help make this transfer a peaceful one so much the better.”

To this point, I have found very little evidence to substantiate her to have actually said any of this. However, this is the response that I have found from her. But in all actuality – what she is saying here seems to be completely defensive and leaves out what her bill does remove – of which it does quite a bit – portions to be “repealed.” Her word not mine. And several key aspects of Texas Castle Law being watered down and diminished in many cases.

https://twitter.com/TerryforTexas/status/1329504824879173634

She continued with 2/3 and 3/3 – to finish out her thoughts.

Terry Meza appears to be upset that she is being misrepresented. So that we don’t hurt her feelings anymore, albeit truth has a tendency to do that – I have the entire Act and Terry Meza’s revisions down below. Green underlines are her adds and red strike-throughs are what she looks to remove. Note – there are entire sections that she is looking to repeal as well. Keep that in mind. Look at what the Bill she sponsored actually states: 1

Details from Texas HB 196 – https://legiscan.com/TX/text/HB196/2021

Bill Title: Relating to the use of deadly force in defense of a person or property.
Spectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 1-0)
Status:(Introduced) 2020-11-09 – Filed [HB196 Detail]
Download:Texas-2021-HB196-Introduced.html

There are several factors here to consider:

Section 1:a:2 – “is unable to safely retreat” is added – giving additional gray area to allow for prosecution, if one were to “help” another person – family or not.
Section 1:c – Is being modified from a place where person “has a right to be present at” to “person’s own habitation.”

Habitation as defined in Texas Penal Code, Title 7, Chapter 30.01:1 as

https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/PE/htm/PE.30.htm#:~:text=(1)%20%22Habitation%22%20means,with%20the%20structure%20or%20vehicle

You can no longer defend where you are lawfully present, you must now be at your “own habitation” to either defend yourself, a person or property.

There is actually more to this. Robbery and aggravated robbery are also stricken from the Castle Law in this HB 196. What does that mean?

Robbery and aggravated robbery as defined in Texas Penal Code, Title 7, Chapter 29.01-03 as

https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/PE/htm/PE.29.htm

Whether robbery or aggravated robbery – the robber can exhibit a deadly weapon, cause serious bodily harm and that person can place the other in fear or imminent bodily injury… and it is still the responsibility of the person who would normally lean on the castle law to defend the position of deadly force anywhere. It is only the point when someone must prevent aggravated kidnapping, murder, sexual assault, or aggravated sexual assault. But if they come into your house or any other place you are located and only intend on robbing you or commit aggravated robbery against you – even causing serious bodily injury to you which would still be prosecuted as a felony – you still must not use “deadly force.”

Remember – robbery and aggravated robbery are no longer justifications to defend property or person with deadly force, unless you are your habitation (excluding church, car, grocery store, etc) and only then if you believe something other than robbery is going to take place.

Section 4 – portions to be repealed: Sections 9:32 (b) and (d)

https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/SOTWDocs/PE/htm/PE.9.htm

Repealing the ability to use deadly force for those entering your habitation, vehicle, place of business or employment. Just process that.

Continuation of modifications of Castle Law as described in HB 196.

Here is the entire Penal Code for Title 2, Chapter 9 so that you can review was is missing as well. 2

Process this and then make an informed decision. There are portions being amended, but some critical portions that are being repealed regarding Castle Law. I wanted to hit some of the high points so that everyone could be educated on the facts. Now – you decide – is this something you can support?

This is my response to her –

Categories
Media Fact Checking

Biden’s All-Female White House Press Team

Categories
Media Fact Checking

Governor of California – Gavin Newsom – Covid restrictions on California – don’t apply to himself

Appears Covid-19 has people saying one thing but doing another. Joe Biden told people to their faces – “I am going to stop fracking,” but then on like television during a debate with Trump, Biden says – “I never said no fracking. I’m just going to phase it out.” Well – Governor Gavin has announced that there are to be no gatherings with people outside of their family and no indoor gatherings especially. Sometime around 10/19/2020 the new rules for gathering were put together for California and implemented. That’s a month ago.

Clear California guidelines 1

AP News reported that California’s Governor Gavin Newsom was “pulling the ‘Emergency Brake’ on efforts to reopen the economy, saying the state is experiencing the fastest growth in cases yet, and if left unchecked, it will lead to “catastrophic outcomes.” The move closes many nonessential indoor businesses and requires the wearing of masks outside homes, with limited exceptions.”

I’m showing the clip below, because it seems that the written word online can be modified and continues to be by various news outlets – when it doesn’t serve their agenda it seems.

Governors ratchet up restrictions ahead of Thanksgiving
By DAVID EGGERT and RACHEL LA CORTE – November 16, 2020
2

On November 13th, 2020 the State of California—Health and Human Services Agency – California Department of Public Health – put out the following statement:

This guidance provides an updated plan for Californians to gather outside their household and replaces the March 16, 2020, October 9, 2020 and other prior gatherings guidance. It applies to private gatherings, and all other gatherings not covered by existing sector guidance are prohibited. It also applies to activities protected by the First Amendment to the extent that they are not already permitted by other guidance, notwithstanding any guidance, orders, or directives to the contrary. Gatherings are defined as social situations that bring together people from different households at the same time in a single space or place. When people from different households mix, this increases the risk of transmission of COVID-19. 3

The rules went into effect mid-October, this was on November 16th, 2020 – but on November 6th, it appears that Gavin had a dinner with 11 other people. This is what was said…At least originally.

As of yesterday – AFTER Governor Gavin’s office specifically stated that there was a small, intimate, 12-person dinner held outdoors with family and a few friends to celebrate a 50th birthday. LA TIMES reported:

4

However, this picture got released which shows something very different, with Gavin being the guy on the far left, ironically enough.

On 11/18/2020 Tucker Carlson reported on an indoor dinner Governor Gavin Newsome had with 11 of his closest friends – or should I say lobbyists/medical physician oversight.
5

California’s Gavin Newsom, the GOVERNOR of the state, who is mandating closures of businesses, minimizing gatherings for health and safety broke his very own rule of law. Either he thinks the rule is bogus or he just thinks it doesn’t apply to him. He also had his team lie about it and then gets on the media and those watching, saying that they are just squabbling over details, but he was following “The Spirit” of the mandate.

“YOU MUST FOLLOW THE SCIENCE!” is what is being yelled over and over at our society. Note the following from another news outlet “Dustin Corcoran, CEO of the California Medical Association, and Janus Norman, the group’s lobbyist and senior vice president, joined Newsom and several other guests Nov. 6 at the French Laundry, an exclusive restaurant in Napa County.” 6

https://www.cmadocs.org/staff/dustin-corcoran
https://www.cmadocs.org/staff/janus-norman

More fun details on Janus Norman and the Lobbying going on in California can be found here 7https://vactruth.com/2015/11/17/lobbyists-for-sb277/[/efn_note)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xkViydbh4_w
Categories
Media Fact Checking

FAKE NEWS & Trump’s Quest to Root Out Fraud in the Election

Had a friend of mine yesterday let me know about how not only did he and his wife vote in person, but when they did vote, their ballots were put in a “special” envelope and was it was put off to the side. Why would someone do this. They voted at different times, one of them voted the second day of early voting and the other right near the end of early voting, several days later. However, they were both told the same thing. Both of you are registered for mail-in ballots. WHAT?!?

They both checked the site https://www.txballot.org/search and both stated that their vote was not counted. I went and checked as well. Guess what. Neither one of them were counted. His wife called the local elections office and was told, “Yes – you are both registered for mail-in voting.” When my friend asked that they get that fixed and tried to escalate the matter, she was told – “Nothing we can do about it.” & “There is no one above me.” After a several minute stand-off and no help whatsoever, my friend just said bye and hung up.

End result. Their votes for President, Representatives, Senate, Judges, etc etc – were not counted. Is it either a mistake or was it intentional. These friends of mine are against voting through mail-in ballots, so there’s that. But this is just one story of tens of thousands that are happening all over the United States.

Which now gets to to the thrust of this particular post.

When I was told of this, I went to find the website again to give to them so that they could contact Trump’s team. Here is the link, that was not readily available. Took several minutes to actually come up with it. djt45.co/stopfraud But here is what I got instead on Google.

TikTok trend forces Trump campaign’s ‘voter fraud hotline’ to close after it is inundated with prank calls 1
Trump campaign voter fraud hotline flooded with prank calls 2
Trump’s Voter Fraud Claims Are Now Being Debunked by His Own Government 3
Trump campaign shuts down ‘voter fraud’ hotline after it’s flooded with prank calls 4

And then –

Voter fraud is real, just not on the scale claimed by Trump 5

Google has too many “more important” articles to convey, rather than just give the link for Trump’s site to shut down voter fraud once and for all. So – You make the decision yourself as to if it were fraud or not. You make a decision as to whether Google, Facebook, Twitter and so on are involved. But when you make that decision, make sure it’s a good one!