Categories
Asked Questions Biden Fact Checking Cause for Concern Media Fact Checking Trump Fact Checking

Who Really Cares for Migrants? A Heartfelt Look at the Human Cost

People constantly criticize President Trump for deporting individuals who cross our border illegally. But let’s be honest: nearly every nation in the world enforces the same laws—if you enter illegally, you’re either deported, fined, or imprisoned. That’s not extremism; it’s sovereignty.

So when I hear that the numbers of deportations or removals are inflated—my question is: inflated for who, and why does that even matter? The argument shouldn’t center on statistics. It should center on human lives.

Here’s the truth: President Trump focused on stopping the problem before it starts. He understood the reality of what migrants—especially women and girls—face on their journey to the U.S. border. We’re not talking about inconvenience or bureaucracy. We’re talking about rape, abuse, extortion, and death.

The Border Is Controlled by Cartels

The U.S.–Mexico border isn’t a safe place. It’s a violent, cartel-controlled zone. The vast majority of migrants, especially women and children, interact with these cartels, and the price to cross includes not just money, but often their bodies and their dignity.

While precise statistics are difficult to track due to underreporting, conservative estimates suggest that at least 1 in 3 women, and as high as 60% in some groups, are sexually assaulted during the journey. Let that sink in.

Organizations like Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, and The Women’s Refugee Commission have documented this horrific reality. They have data. They have stories. They’ve been ringing alarm bells for years.

What Did Trump Do?

Trump said: “Don’t come.” He tried to stop the flow—because he knew that if people don’t try to cross, they won’t fall into the hands of traffickers. They won’t be raped. They won’t be extorted. They won’t be exposed to one of the most brutal, inhumane experiences on earth.

Stopping the flow means saving lives and protecting the vulnerable.

And Then Came Biden…

During the 2020 Democratic presidential debate, Joe Biden made this statement:

What I would do as president is several more things because things have changed. I would, in fact, make sure that there is—we immediately surge to the border all those people seeking asylum. They deserve to be heard. That’s who we are. We’re a nation that says, ‘If you want to flee and you’re fleeing oppression, you should come.’

And they came.

From January 2021 to early 2025, CBP recorded over 8.2 million encounters at the southern border. Add to that 1.6 million known “gotaways”—people who crossed undetected—and we’re looking at more than 10 million illegal crossings.

Do the Gruesome Math

Let’s just focus on the 10 million we know about. Let’s say—very conservatively—that 1 out of every 3 was a woman. That’s over 3 million women.

Now take just the low-end estimate: 1 in 3 of those women were raped during the journey. That’s 1 million women violated.

One million women raped.

And why were they there? Because Biden called them to the border. He told them to surge. He told them to come.

He didn’t tell them, “Beware of the cartels.” He didn’t warn them, “You could be raped or killed.” He didn’t say, “Wait until we have a humane system in place.” He opened the door to suffering.

This Is Not Political—It’s Personal

Did you ever stop to consider this?

If you voted for Biden, you need to face this. This isn’t about partisanship—this is about people. About real human beings, especially women and children, who have been brutalized because of a policy of open arms with no safeguards.

I’m not asking you to take my word for it. Do the research. Visit sites like:

👉 https://www.notentitledtoyourownfacts.com/2022/09/19/bidens-call-for-migrants-to-surge-the-border/

👉 Human Rights Watch

👉 Amnesty International

👉 Women’s Refugee Commission

Who Really Cares?

Ask yourself this: Who cares more for immigrants? The one who warns them not to come and suffer, or the one who invites them into a living nightmare?

Trump’s policy was hard—but it saved lives. Biden’s words may have sounded compassionate—but they paved the road to millions of shattered lives.

If we truly care about justice, compassion, and human dignity—we must stop the flow.

Categories
Asked Questions Biden Fact Checking Cause for Concern Media Fact Checking Trump Fact Checking

Biden’s Presidency Book Ends

President Joe Biden pardons Hunter Biden for his case including the following:

2020 – the Laptop from hell, owned by Hunter Biden – CNN, MSNCB, FACEBOOK, DOJ, ETC said, RUSSIAN DISINFORMATION. We now know it was all true and that it was all Hunter. Biden said, “that was not my son’s (Hunter’s) laptop.

Fast-forward 4 years. Trump indicted for dozens on things as smoke and mirror for Biden’s son. And NOW…

Joe Biden PARDONS HUNTER BIDEN

Joe Biden said he will not pardon Hunter Biden… 1

Just kidding now, says Joe Biden. What did Joe pardon his son of?

Gun convictions – 3 Federal Felony Gun Charges – Guilty (ownership of guns as a convicted druggie as he acknowledged in his own book.) – 2

Tax evading – $1.4 million – admitted to and found guilty of not paying taxes from 2016 to 2019. 3

So, the laptop that was silenced prior to Joe becoming president and would have influenced a lot of votes. 8 in 10 believe Biden Laptop Cover-Up changed the outcome of the election.

5

AND – a majority of Americans believe Joe Biden was involved with Hunter’s illegal dealings with Ukraine and China. -CNN 6

Edit – addition of information with support: 5/6/2025

Several reputable news organizations have conducted forensic analyses of data purportedly from Hunter Biden’s laptop, finding no evidence that the data was fabricated or part of a Russian disinformation campaign.

A credible confirmation that Hunter Biden’s laptop was not Russian disinformation comes from multiple mainstream news outlets. Here are a few:

  1. CBS News – In a November 2022 report, CBS confirmed the authenticity of data from Hunter Biden’s laptop after an independent forensic review.
    • CBS News report
    • In November 2022, CBS News commissioned an independent forensic review of a copy of the laptop data initially provided to federal investigators in 2019. The analysis, conducted by Computer Forensics Services, found that the data, including over 120,000 emails, was “consistent with normal, everyday use of a computer” and showed “no evidence that the user data had been modified, fabricated or tampered with.” The chief technology officer of the firm stated, “I have no doubt in my mind that this data was created by Hunter Biden, and that it came from a computer under Mr. Biden’s control.” Wikipedia
  2. The New York Times – In a March 2022 article, the Times acknowledged that emails from the laptop were authenticated as part of a federal investigation.
  3. Washington Post – In March 2022, they conducted their own forensic analysis confirming thousands of emails as authentic.
    • Washington Post article
    • In March 2022, The Washington Post reported on its own forensic analysis of a copy of the laptop data. Two independent analysts verified thousands of emails as authentic, using cryptographic signatures. While the analysis noted that some data had been accessed and copied by others over time, there was no evidence that the verified emails had been tampered with. The Post concluded that the data it could authenticate appeared genuine and not part of a disinformation campaign. Wikipedia

These outlets, after initial skepticism or caution, later confirmed the data’s authenticity and reported that the laptop was not a product of Russian disinformation.

Department of Justice Confirmation

In January 2024, filings by the U.S. Department of Justice’s special counsel, David C. Weiss, referred to “the defendant’s Apple MacBook Pro, which he had left at a computer store,” marking the first public confirmation by the DOJ of the laptop’s authenticity. Wikipedia

These findings collectively indicate that the laptop and its contents are authentic and not the product of Russian disinformation.

Categories
Asked Questions Biden Fact Checking Kamala Fact Checking Media Fact Checking Trump Fact Checking

Trump says, “To get me, somebody would have to shoot through the fake news. And I don’t mind that so much”

I watched the video evidence and it’s clear, Trump said that. (video at bottom) There is plenty of context to tell what he’s saying. Is that the best thing to say? Nope. Is that a jerk thing to say? Yup. Did Trump say for someone to put CNN in the “Bull’s Eye” like Biden did about Trump? Nope. Yet, there are MANY people who would vote Biden in, because he acted like he had moral high-ground. Really? Biden calling a woman a “Lying Dog Faced Pony Soldier?” That’s just a ridiculous statement. 7

Whatever!

Trump is a Threat to Democracy

So they say…. Biden…. Harris…. NBC…. CNN…. LA Times…. NPR…. and PBS????

AND – TIME MAGAZINE.

Donald Trump Is an Existential Threat to America and the World8

In 2016 – Time stated “PERSON OF THE YEAR – DONALD TRUMP”9

But, here’s more from many different news media. Fake media. Media who show Trump in the worst of light. Media which, when we read it, we get so mad that we can’t even breath sometimes. And – the media who stir up such hate, that people lash out.

It’s not alarmist: A second Trump term really is an extinction-level threat to democracy 10
Harris argues that Trump poses a threat to democracy in the final days of the race11
Harris paints Trump as threat to democracy as Election Day draws closer12
Harris revives message around democracy as Trump escalates rhetoric. Will it work?13
Letters to the Editor: Trump is actually a threat to democracy. It’s OK to speak the truth14
Democrats to highlight threat to democracy they say Trump poses, giving speaking roles to January 6 committee lawmakers15
Biden argues Trump remains a threat to democracy — a case his campaign thinks resonates with voters16

I hear you Steven. I agree with what Katherine said, “For me, it’s more about the media. Trump is an ass, no doubt, and an ineloquent speaker on his best day. But the outright lies….The reporting on things that he absolutely DID NOT SAY… We can’t just let that go ignored, can we?” But I don’t agree with your comment Steven, that it’s been a “small amount of media disinformation.” The media has been lying about Trump, has caused great harm to Trump and his family for the last 8 years, yet Trump wants to help America. Why is that?

Trump is not my role model and not my LORD and Savior. That would be Jesus. But God puts kings in power to either build up idols, which I believe has been the case for the last 4 years OR God puts kings in power to tear down idols, which I believe Trump will again. If anything, I would equate Trump to King David. Both couldn’t keep it in their pants, but led with a strong hand when dealing with other countries and false idols. Either way, Trump is our president again and he wants to heal out country. We need to get on-board and support him through our prayers and our actions. Peace man.

Categories
Biden Fact Checking Cause for Concern Kamala Fact Checking Media Fact Checking Trump Fact Checking

United States is About to Go Under: Kamala against the wall 2019, but now wants to “Strengthen the Border” – When will she tell the truth?

2019, Kamala said she is against Trump and his wall, saying “they aren’t jumpin’ over walls” complaining that our country shouldn’t have us pay $5 billion dollars to build the wall.

That was her position then. Biden/Harris track record since then:

Open border crisis cost to the American public to house, feed and care for the millions of people who have illegally crossed the border – and this is a conservative number.

$150,000,000,000.

One Hundred and Fifty BILLION dollars. 17

Studies would suggest that it’s well over $400 Billion – but who’s counting right? Kamala was worried about $5 Billion for a wall.

An additional $39 Billion, according to NBC News, was spent fighting drugs coming across our borders in 2022 alone. 18 That’s just fighting fentanyl and other illegal drugs coming into our country through smugglers of which a huge portion is coming across the southern border. Over another $150 Billion for the Biden/Harris term.

Opiod overdose deaths in 2021, 2022, 2023 are over 300,000 lives of men, women and children. Between when Trump was in office to Biden, it raced up from 30 deaths per 100,000 to 40 deaths per 100,000. 25% increase the first year of Biden’s presidency. 19

Covid-19 – fortunately the pandemic is in our rear-view mirror, but the numbers are out:

Trump: 385,000 people died in the United States.

Biden: Over 800,000 people died in the United States 20

December 2021 Newsweek, which was much more left leaning then, than it is today – even seeming right leaning in many cases today wrote the following,

Joe Biden based his entire 2020 presidential campaign on the promise he would solve covid by trusting “the science.” It was all bullshit. He’s presided over more deaths, hospitalizations & cases than Trump. Yet media crushed Trump for covid, gives Biden a pass,” political commentator Clay Travis tweeted. 21

Politifact – decidedly a left leaning publication said the following in 2022:

On Dec. 2, U.S. Rep. Roger Williams, R-Austin, said in an email, “According to the latest data from John (sic) Hopkins University, the number of COVID-19 deaths recorded so far in 2021 has surpassed the total for 2020.”

He linked this increased level of deaths to President Joe Biden and credited the vaccine development to former President Donald Trump’s Operation Warp Speed, a federal agency partnership to accelerate the development and distribution of the vaccine.

We also found a Dec. 21 tweet by Williams that said,”Americans are WORSE off under this Administration than ever before,” citing “More COVID deaths under President Biden than President Trump.”

At the request of a reader, we’re fact-checking this claim: Is it true that, despite vaccine availability, more people died from COVID-19 in 2021 than in 2020? 22

Border crossings are the highest today that they have ever been. Why? Biden during the debate with Trump in 2020 stated… and I quote…

What I would do as president is several more things, because things have changed. I would in fact make sure that there is, that we immediately surge the border, all those people who are seeking asylum. They deserve to be heard. That’s who we are.
Don’t believe me? I’ve posted this before – The link -> 23 BIDEN TOLD THEM TO COME!!! However a year later, just like every politician, Biden then says
Don’t come. Don’t leave your town or city or community.24
Hypocrisy, right?

But it was too late, the damage was done… Here are the number of people caught at the border and largely deported. Until 2021, where they were largely let in and paid for by the American Public.

·  2014: Approximately 569,000 apprehensions at the southwest border

·  2015: Encounters 337,000

·  2016: Around 408,000 as migration from Central America rose again.

·  2017: Encounters dipped to 303,000, attributed to stricter border policies.

·  2018: A surge brought encounters up to 521,000

·  2019: Numbers peaked at around 851,000 as more families and unaccompanied minors crossed. (remember kids in cages that were stripped from their families? Not so, it would seem)

·  2020: Encounters 458,000 Title 42

·  2021: Numbers surged dramatically to 1.7 million, Biden tells them to come and largely due to Biden/Kamala’s easing of restrictions and Title 42 limitations.

·  2022: Encounters further increased, reaching over 2.3 million as migration pressures persisted.

·  2023: Encounters totaled about 2.4 million

Fast forward to today.

Kamala says now, well – I’m not afraid of using good ideas, in relation to continuing Trump’s wall. She says “he didn’t do much of anything” yet the evidence is to the contrary and clearly.

Kamala does not tell the truth. It’s not exaggeration. She now is changing many of her positions to follow what Trump has been saying all this time. BUT – we know she will not do anything she says when it comes to helping this country as a whole. She will spin us into new wars, she will further bankrupt this county and she will drive us into the worst amount of animosity that we have ever seen. Christians – your freedom of speech and your freedom of religion are on the ballot this time. Kamala is against Christianity. If you don’t think so… Just watch for yourself.

Trump is the only answer, because standing on your moral highground, with the idea that the independent or green party is going to help our country is just wrong. Trump is an ass. But remember, God used David. Suck up your pride and do the actual right thing.

https://www.facebook.com/1043139291/videos/863850059232501/

Categories
Biden Fact Checking Cause for Concern Media Fact Checking

Biden & BlackRock Responsible for Trump Attack?

There isn’t going to be much to this post. Just evidence of details around the event of a very near assassination of Trump. I’ve included an updated outline and then below work backwards with all the fine details…

  • President Joe Biden withdraws his candidacy for the Democrat Party and nominates Kamala Harris – July 22, 2024
  • Assassination attempt of Trump by 20 year old who was in a Blackrock commercial – July 13, 2024
  • Joe tells some high powered and very rich people, including Blackrock CEO that Trump needs to be put into the “Bull’s-eye.” – ~July 8, 2024
  • Video interview of Joe saying he would only drop out if “the Lord Alrighty” were to tell him to… and that during the debate with Trump, Joe said he “it was a bad episode.” ~July 6, 2024 21
  • Trump and Joe have a presidential debate on CNN and the media on the left and right reported that Joe failed miserably – June 27, 2024

****Details****

Biden did say to put Trump in the “Bull’s-eye” and when asked, he said, “I didn’t say crosshair.” What a peculiar defense. Watch for yourself.

https://youtu.be/YdMbGE4TiOo

NY Post says, “President Biden appeared to defend saying that Democrats should put Donald Trump in a “bullseye” less than a week before the former president was shot, saying “I didn’t say crosshairs…“I was talking about ‘focus on,’” the 81-year-old president told NBC anchor Lester Holt in a Monday interview. 25

CNN says, “President Joe Biden addressed his comments made to donors about putting Donald Trump in a “bullseye,” calling the verbiage a mistake during his interview with NBC’s Lester Holt.” 26

Sometime, on or before July 8th, 2024, Biden met with BlackRock a $10 Trillion Dollar company. A week before Trump was shot.

July 8, 2024 – Fortune Magazine says, “Wall Street titans met privately to discuss President Biden, with one CEO saying the president dropping out of the race is an ‘inevitability’” – BYMARCO QUIROZ-GUTIERREZ
July 8, 2024 at 2:04 PM CDT

Which included the CEO of Blackrock, Larry Fink. (below in the article) 27

We find out this week that BlackRock actually had direct connection with the person that shot Trump. This isn’t conspiracy theory. CNN reported this among all the other media, Left or Right.

CNN reported BlackRock had a commercial with the person who shot Trump over this past weekend.

28

This is also fascinating:

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/vswiX81IqhQ

Remember, after-all, at one time Oprah Winfrey was suggesting that Trump should consider running for president. He said he would only do it, if our country was going down-hill.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SEPs17_AkTI&t=2s
Categories
Asked Questions Biden Fact Checking Cause for Concern Media Fact Checking Trump Fact Checking

January 6 – “Insurrection” Part 2

It has been stated more times than I can count by the media and Biden, that Trump led an insurrection on January 6th, 2021. You judge, but please look at the evidence this time…

The January 6th committee has said countless times that Trump did NOT order 10,000 troops to ensure an event like what happened on January 6th. This is 100% true, that Trump did not order troops to descend on Washington D.C. So now what?

Prior to January 6th, Trump “offered” 10,000 to

Chief of Staff Mark Meadows stated that Trump ordered the Secretary of Defense to make available 10,000 National Guardsmen for the City of Washington for January 6th. Acting Secretary of Defense, Mr. Miller then told Trump that the Department of Defense (DoD) was going to provide any number of Guard personnel that Washington officials requested. The then mayor of Washington D.C. on January 5th said they would not request any federal law enforcement – which would include the National Guard.

What happens now, is that the offer for these 10,000 National Guardsmen would then go to the Capitol Police. This offer was turned down by the House Sergeant-at-Arms, Paul Irving turned down the offer. His reasoning was that he was concerned by the “optics” of having National Guard present and didn’t feel that the intelligence supported it.

On CNN live, Trump mentioned that “Crazy” Nancy Pelosi (over the Capitol Police) and the Mayor both turned down his offer. “I offered them soldiers, National Guard, I offered them whatever they want and they turned me down.”

The result from the January 6th committee was, and I quote, “President Trump had authority and responsibility to direct deployment of the National Guard in the District of Columbia, but never gave any order to deploy the National Guard on January 6th or on any other day.”

And so now, for what actually happened.

According to Miller’s testimony, Trump asked during that meeting whether the District of Columbia’s mayor had requested National Guard troops for Jan. 6, the day Congress was to ratify Joe Biden’s presidential election victory.
Trump told Miller to “fill” the request, the former defense secretary testified. Miller said Trump told him: “Do whatever is necessary to protect demonstrators that were executing their constitutionally protected rights.”

29

What’s left out in every piece of new media is that the National Guard were actually nearby. You heard me right. The U.S. Military was deliberately restrained on January 6th from responding to the events of January 6th, because there were fears that there would be a military coup. Smoke and mirrors from the Democratic leadership, Nancy Pelosi and gang. The U.S. Military did show up that day, but only have some of the protestors and a Capitol Police officer died. Only one person was shot by the Capitol Police and that was a 5’2″ 115lb lady who used to serve our military.

Trump has offered Military troops to several states during the BLM protests and all of those were rejected as well. Trump wasn’t going to force the military to overrun cities like Washington D.C. But he offerend them all support. Seems that no Democrat wanted help from Trump even though it would have been the right thing to do and a lot of people died and a lot of business were burned down because of it. If you are going to place blame – do the right thing. Vote for Trump 2024.

Categories
Biden Fact Checking Media Fact Checking Trump Fact Checking

Trump’s Tax Cuts Primarily for the Top 1%

So they say, Trump’s Tax Cuts in 2027 were 87% for the benefit of the top 1%?

I heard this the other night and I gave my typical anecdote that I had received benefit by seeing a reduction in taxes as well as some of my friends. I pointed out, we are lower-middle and at the time we were a single-income family. He continued to protest. The conversation dove back into the 80’s with Reagan and his trickle-down economics and there were all kinds of factoids presented. The one source me mentioned was, “I heard it on NPR.” To which I was exacerbated and ended the conversation because the was no fruit.

This morning, as I almost always do, I reflect in conversations that I have to evaluate my thinking. Was I right in saying something? Should I reevaluate my perspective? What are actually the facts of the matter? Was the manner in which I communicated, friendly or even useful? What was I trying to accomplish?

I recognized the guy I was speaking with and I even knew his name. Very pleasant guy and we have had random chit chat conversations in the past. Started with primarily a conversation about interest rates, with him sharing some rates his family had experienced and I with my current house which I had bought within the last year. I’m rather not pleased with interest rates and expressed the resemblance to years long gone by where rates were going up up up. At the writing of this article, in prime real estate it’s high 7’s and even 8 and up, depending on the investment. My friend then said, yeah, we won’t see interest rates low like we did only a couple years ago, for a long time, or something to that effect. But this is where I revealed all my cards in one statement… “I bet if Trump were to be elected again, he would turn the interest rates back down.”. That’s what set the trajectory of our conversation to crap.

My mistake.

Be that at it may. I am still going to go through and evaluate the conversation…

First, I should have tested the waters for political leanings, without something as inflammatory as mentioning Trump’s name. Sets people off in a weird way sometimes. Short answer to myself, be patient and don’t assume that everyone in “small-town USA” is going to support former Republican presidents. Truth be told, I am less fond of some of the former Republican presidents now, than I ever was. But ironically, I voted independent, up until Obama. Fun fact. Also, another fun fact, Trump wasn’t who I voted for in the primaries, leading up to his initial presidency.

Back to how I responded… When my friend told me that NPR was his source, I responded very poorly. I didn’t start calling him names, but I scoffed for sure. That was a big woops moment for me. I owe him an apology for that, to be sure. I did go to shake his hand, to which he looked me in the face and shook my hand as well… But it was not the way I like to end conversations at all. I screwed up.

What was I trying to accomplish? Looking back, and for some odd reason, I just assumed the man I was speaking with would find it, at the very least, mildly humorous or entertaining to suggest that Trump could turn things around with interest rates. Nope. Conversation went tilt, from then on. I will need to address at some point.

Now to the meat of the factoids my friend presented… Beginning with the tax cuts mostly benefitting the tip 1%.

CNN reports (efn_note)https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/26/politics/fact-check-sanders-town-hall-tax-cuts/index.html

 (Su_quote) Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont appeared at a CNN presidential town hall Monday night. After his first question from the audience, Sanders argued that President Donald Trump “said he’d have a tax plan to benefit the middle class, but 83% of the benefits go to the 1%.”

CNN states, (su_quote)Facts First: This isn’t true right now, but if certain tax cuts are not extended it will be the case in 2027, according to the Tax Policy Center.

2027. Ok. So, technically, Trump did Not cut taxes primarily for the rich. But let’s read more from CNN.

The tax reform passed in December 2017 included tax cuts for corporations as well as individuals – but while the benefits for business were permanent, the individual taxpayer cuts will expire by 2027. If Congress does nothing to extend them, the top 1% will at that point receive roughly 83% of the tax cut benefits, according to estimates from the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center.

The same study said that for the 2018 tax year, the top 1% would receive 20.5% of the benefits from the tax cuts.

Why the 10-year timeline? That’s thanks to Senate rules that allow tax cuts to pass with fewer than 60 votes if they won’t increase the deficit in 10 years – a necessity for Republicans to get the tax reform through.

But it’s possible that a future Congress and President would vote to extend Trump’s tax cuts – even if Democrats are in charge. A vast majority of the last major round of tax cuts passed by President George W. Bush were made permanent under President Barack Obama.

Who else was talking about Trump’s Tax Cuts for the 1%?

review https://www.factcheck.org/2023/03/bidens-one-sided-attack-on-republican-budgeting/

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/truth-trumps-tax-cuts-numbers-120026435.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9kdWNrZHVja2dvLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAENl0eJWjTo1WzSZD91PKNRyRnRT0n2Qgdsg_SYNONhrA3QMsl_v-sJVwH9U19gwnk3kk5sEOxJnWsiv8mAx0zs9F56E1TH631blC069LEBBZ78DLpvEyk0FhXfQStVZ4Aopv9vf7tTVGF2mzU2g_LQ4z8C4ghRzRLShiTs5MFzq

Simple evaluation is that this was a media and Dem false talking point.

What about

Categories
Biden Fact Checking Cause for Concern Media Fact Checking

Presidents and Confidential Information

Biden chastised Trump for Trump having Classified documents at his house in Maro Lago.

https://youtu.be/tMuFCdrwJRU

Biden asked by Peter Doocy, “You have Classified material next to your Corvette?” Biden responds, “My Corvette’s in a locked garage, not like it was out in the street.”

https://youtu.be/FXSyIfPpRoE

What do you do with this kind of information? Some will say, well, I like Biden, so it’s ok for him. Others will say they hate Trump, so it’s one standard for one and not for the other. And yet others will perhaps change their tune about Trump on yet another hyped up charge against him. We’ll see.

Categories
Biden Fact Checking Cause for Concern Media Fact Checking

Kids in Cages – Separated at the Border – or not?

Trump told us in 2020 that the pictures that were shown with “kids in cages” was actually a set of pictures from Obama’s administration. Biden then went on the record to say that Trump was responsible for the splitting up children from their families. Trump however said that it was cartels that were bringing in children and dumping them into the U.S. So, what is actually true? 30

Trump was clear and Biden was clear. But it seems that Trump was a bad man, doing something that no president had done before.

But now, it seems that hindsight it 20/20. Or should I say 20/22.

New York Post is clear – “Mexican drug cartels using kids as decoys in to smuggle its members into US: sheriff” 31

Mexico’s ruthless drug cartels are using helpless children as decoys to smuggle their members into the US — courtesy of the Biden administration’s relaxed immigration policies, law enforcement told The Post.

CNN is reporting it – April of 2021 “Border patrol video shows young children being dropped over 14-foot border fence into the US”32

It’s crystal clear. Trump was telling the truth. Biden was lying. And the “Woke” left believed Biden. So, it’s worse today that it was 2 years ago. Just let that marinate.

Categories
Biden Fact Checking Cause for Concern

Biden and Armageddon

Why is Biden so concerned???

Are we about to be in another War? Biden lowered us from a safe status (DEFCON5) to DEFCON3 – which means “Increase in force readiness.” Which ultimately means, it looks like we could either enter or be part of another un-winnable war.

These are the prior times of DEFCON change:

DEFCON 3: September 11th, 2001: Attack On The Twin Towers
DEFCON 2: January 15th, 1991: The Gulf War
DEFCON 3: August 18th, 1976: Operation Paul Bunyan
DEFCON 3: October 6th, 1973: Yom Kippur War
DEFCON 2: October 22nd, 1962: Cuban Missile Crisis

Seems Biden is concerned about nuclear “Armageddon,” but is he only concerned because he is the one that brought up Russia as a nuclear threat? Maybe Biden is concerned because he said that Putin should be removed from the presidency of Russia?

Our last president, with his brash tone, incendiary remarks and ability to piss people off globally, evidently impacted a grand total of ZERO countries, when it comes to starting a new war – more or less having threat of any kind of Nuclear War. But not even two years in – we are falling apart as a country, in a huge downturn in our economy, we have entered a recession and now we need to be concerned about some type of Nuclear assault? And all before mid-term elections.

May be an image of text that says 'President Biden Says He's Concerned About Nuclear "Armageddon" ® FUTURISM ® OCTOBER 2022 MIN READ President Joe Biden is publicly warning, in the starkest words possible, that a nuclear "Armageddon" with Russia could be imminent. HELP NUKE From 'football' to 'biscuits': how Biden would launch nukes'

CNBC – Biden: Nuclear ‘Armageddon’ risk highest since ’62 crisis
PUBLISHED THU, OCT 6 202210:43 PM EDT
www.defconlevel.com/history.php
nsarchive.gwu.edu/briefing-book/nuclear-vault/2021-04-08/crises-alerts-defcons-1961-1976-part-ii
(Help/Nuke is courtesy of the Babylon Bee)