A father is distraught. He found out his girlfriend killed their child.
If a person attacks a woman and through that attack her unborn child is killed, the person will be charged with murder. This is fact.1 Happened not that long ago in Texas and the man was charged with “capital murder for causing the death of Trena’s unborn child.” How old was this child, you might ask? 5 weeks old.
Back to the father whose girlfriend killed their child. This child was 5 months old when she had an abortion. She regrets her decision and he is heart-broken. His daughter was taken away from him. At this point, he wants to know a few things. Since the clinic paid for the abortion, what did they ultimately do with his daughter’s body? He also wants to know what she looked like when she was pulled from his girlfriend’s body. Work this one out. The baby was alive. Our laws indicate that it’s capital murder to kill a child in the womb… So what’s the question now???
Texas Penal Code §19.03 states that a person commits the offense of capital murder if the person intentionally or knowingly causes the death of an individual and the person murders an individual under 10 years of age. The Texas Penal Code further defines an individual as “a human being who is alive, including an unborn child at every stage of gestation from fertilization until birth” in §1.07(26).
It has been stated more times than I can count by the media and Biden, that Trump led an insurrection on January 6th, 2021. You judge, but please look at the evidence this time…
The January 6th committee has said countless times that Trump did NOT order 10,000 troops to ensure an event like what happened on January 6th. This is 100% true, that Trump did not order troops to descend on Washington D.C. So now what?
Prior to January 6th, Trump “offered” 10,000 to
Chief of Staff Mark Meadows stated that Trump ordered the Secretary of Defense to make available 10,000 National Guardsmen for the City of Washington for January 6th. Acting Secretary of Defense, Mr. Miller then told Trump that the Department of Defense (DoD) was going to provide any number of Guard personnel that Washington officials requested. The then mayor of Washington D.C. on January 5th said they would not request any federal law enforcement – which would include the National Guard.
What happens now, is that the offer for these 10,000 National Guardsmen would then go to the Capitol Police. This offer was turned down by the House Sergeant-at-Arms, Paul Irving turned down the offer. His reasoning was that he was concerned by the “optics” of having National Guard present and didn’t feel that the intelligence supported it.
On CNN live, Trump mentioned that “Crazy” Nancy Pelosi (over the Capitol Police) and the Mayor both turned down his offer. “I offered them soldiers, National Guard, I offered them whatever they want and they turned me down.”
The result from the January 6th committee was, and I quote, “President Trump had authority and responsibility to direct deployment of the National Guard in the District of Columbia, but never gave any order to deploy the National Guard on January 6th or on any other day.”
And so now, for what actually happened.
According to Miller’s testimony, Trump asked during that meeting whether the District of Columbia’s mayor had requested National Guard troops for Jan. 6, the day Congress was to ratify Joe Biden’s presidential election victory. Trump told Miller to “fill” the request, the former defense secretary testified. Miller said Trump told him: “Do whatever is necessary to protect demonstrators that were executing their constitutionally protected rights.”
2
What’s left out in every piece of new media is that the National Guard were actually nearby. You heard me right. The U.S. Military was deliberately restrained on January 6th from responding to the events of January 6th, because there were fears that there would be a military coup. Smoke and mirrors from the Democratic leadership, Nancy Pelosi and gang. The U.S. Military did show up that day, but only have some of the protestors and a Capitol Police officer died. Only one person was shot by the Capitol Police and that was a 5’2″ 115lb lady who used to serve our military.
Trump has offered Military troops to several states during the BLM protests and all of those were rejected as well. Trump wasn’t going to force the military to overrun cities like Washington D.C. But he offerend them all support. Seems that no Democrat wanted help from Trump even though it would have been the right thing to do and a lot of people died and a lot of business were burned down because of it. If you are going to place blame – do the right thing. Vote for Trump 2024.
A guy recently and smugly I might add, asked me the question…
As a matter of fact, he was on to something. So, I did more research and came up with the following. Some I was already aware of, but some was new and may be of interest, whether you are left, right or center…
Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez called the Capitol riot on Jan. 6 a “terror attack,” which resulted in “almost 10 dead.”
That’s terrible. AOC is a progressive democrat, so she MUST be talking about how many people the Trump supporters killed, right? Right?
Here are the first two who were killed. Oh, I mean, died of heart attacks. “Stop the Steal” protesters Kevin and Benjamin – both in their 50’s. 3 Kevin a two time voter of Barack Obama, but now Trump supporter who “had a history of high blood pressure…suffered a heart attack” prior to the Capitol being breached. Benjamin was “in the area of the United States Capitol in attendance of first amendment activities” when he died, also of natural causes.
Philips, a computer programmer, died due to a “medical emergency…hypertensive atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease” which resulted in heart failure due to high blood pressure.
That’s 3 dead so far. Died of natural causes and at the moment of their death, NOT Democrats. Shall I continue? Yes, lets.
“Rosesanne Boyland, 34 was crushed by fellow rioters.” First, she was part of the crowd and not against them. Then after HUNDREDS OF REPORTS that she was crushed by the chaotic rioters like she “was dying after being trampled by the mob” it was quietly made known that she had died of “acute amphetamine intoxication” or more clearly stated, poisoned herself either unintentionally or intentionally, but the result is the same, which leads to hypertension, tachycardia, as well as other less lethal side effect. She was not pushed down, she did not die from being trampled. That’s fact. But the damage was done and people believed it, because the news said so.
Then there is Ashli Babbit a 35 year old woman, an Air Force veteran who was shot an killed by a Capitol Police officer. As you watch the video, watch how the Capitol Police step aside to let the crowd continue to “break down the door” with a wooden flag pole with a flag on it and some guys helmet. Then another Capitol police officer, in a business suit, behind the door shoots the 5’2″ and 115lb unarmed woman as she was climbing up the door. She hadn’t attacked the Capitol Police that were standing right next to the doors on the outside. There was no indication that she was a physical threat. But, again, right or wrong, she was one more stat of a dead Trump fan. NOT a democrat. 4
Now, we have 5 police officers “killed” during the Capitol attack on January 6. Remember? This was big in the news. Multiple police killed during Jan 6 Insurrection!
USCP Officer Brian Sicknick “passed away due to injuries sustained while on-duty…was injured while physically engaging with protesers. He returned to his division office and collapsed.” That’s what was reported. It was further stated that he had been struck by a fire extinguisher. But medical experts LATER determined his death was not caused by any such thing. In fact, on APRIL 19th, more than 3 months later,
District of Columbia Chief Medical Examiner Francisco J. Diaz found that Sicknick suffered two strokes nearly eight hours after being sprayed with a chemical irritant during the riot. Diaz told the Post that Sicknick died of natural causes, but “all that transpired played a role in his condition.”
That day, US. Capitol Police released a statement that read: “The USCP accepts the findings from the District of Columbia’s Office of the Chief Medical Examiner that Officer Brian Sicknick died of natural causes. This does not change the fact Officer Sicknick died in the line of duty, courageously defending Congress and the Capitol.”
Don’t want to forget that he was defending Congress. Ok. The report was that he was killed. That’s what the media reported HUNDREDS OF TIMES, but did you know he had two strokes after being sprayed with a chemical irritant? Well then it was the Trump protestors that sprayed him, right? Even as of Jan 20, 2023 NPR was reporting that Trump supporters were throwing smoke bombs and gas bombs. 5
CBS is still pushing the narrative that Sicknick was a victim of Trump supporters killing him. 6 And even though it was ruled natural causes, there were still two people sentenced to years behind bars for the attack on Sicknick. Go figure. NY Times reported that, Brian Sicknick “died the day after he was overpowered and beaten by rioters from the mob at the Capitol.” 7 They finished with, ““He returned to his division office and collapsed,” the Capitol Police said in a statement. “He was taken to a local hospital, where he succumbed to his injuries.” which turned out to be untrue. But the damage was done.
Here we see it was Capitol Police using tear gas, flashbangs, etc. It’s inciting a riot by hurting civilians just standing there. Most of which were peaceful, right? 8
So, was it Insurrectionists or was it Capitol Police that were indicated as deploying smoke/gas against Sicknick?
The Hill (left leaning) on the day of Jan. 6th wrote a piece, “Police using tear gas, smoke grenades to clear Capitol grounds ahead of curfew.”11
USCP Officer Howard, 51 who had worked there for 15 years, committed suicide three days after the event. Then DC Police Officer Jeffrey, 35 committed suicide because “he was afraid that he might die,” as reported by his wife. Two more, 6 months later, who were not there during the mob, but there after hours also committed suicide – Kyle 26 and Gunther (age unknown).
Three officers “committed suicide”? How exactly did they do that? No one seems to be talking about that. They will never tell their story of what they saw that day, will they? And what was Officer Jeffrey really afraid of? “He was afraid that he might die?” Really think about that.
Well.. There is AOCs list of people who were killed at the Insurrection. One tiny unarmed lady was shot and killed by an out of uniform Capitol Police officer and a smattering of heart attacks and suicides.
What was the Insurrection again? A bunch of people carrying flags, charged by Donald Trump to go down and “peacefully and patriotically” protest. None of them were armed. They were doused in chemical smoke while outside of the building, tear gassed and some reports of other items thrown into the crowd.
And then… we have evidence that there were many FBI and other government officials in the crowd, “INCITING VIOLENCE.”
Aside from that, Trump had asked to have the National Guard on hand, but Pelosi and the Democrats said no.
Capitol Police officers stepped aside. Opened doors for these protestors and the list goes on and on…
What’s the truth? You decide. But don’t for one minute think that the media didn’t shape your opinion and the opinion of millions in the United States to think that there was so much more going on January 6th than there was…..
You have heard so many things about Trump that are patently false. This agenda that I laid out for you here is such a clear example of what the media and Democrat darlings said, vs. what was actually the truth, in order to derail Trump from ever running for president again. However, there are too many people who rely on truth to live out their lives, rather than listening to the crap fed to them by fake news media…
I’ll end with this. During the impeachment trials, it was clear that the Democrats were skewing what Trump had said during his Jan 6th speech. Even cutting out words from Trump’s speech to make is sound like it was him inciting everyone. But in fact, it was revealed in open chambers by the House Republicans that Trump did in fact say these very clear and poignant words… “Peacefully and Patriotically make your voices heard!!!”
Snopes, known for being far left and skewing their facts is actually in full agreement that during the second impeachment trial on Feb. 9, 2021 of sitting U.S. President Donald Trump that
House Democrats did not show footage of Trump telling supporters on Jan. 6 to “peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard.”12
They cut out spots where Trump was clear with his direction and then assigned nefarious intentions of other words he said. You judge, but make it a good judgement.
I’ve been hearing this forever. They wanted Trump’s tax returns for years. Well, Trump delivered. But before he did, he had a conversation with Hillary, which answered what they found all that time later.
Trump did pay millions in taxes. However, due to Hillary and the Dems, there are tons of loopholes that her donors get and Trump said that he uses those loopholes too. At least he is honest.
So they say, Trump’s Tax Cuts in 2027 were 87% for the benefit of the top 1%?
I heard this the other night and I gave my typical anecdote that I had received benefit by seeing a reduction in taxes as well as some of my friends. I pointed out, we are lower-middle and at the time we were a single-income family. He continued to protest. The conversation dove back into the 80’s with Reagan and his trickle-down economics and there were all kinds of factoids presented. The one source me mentioned was, “I heard it on NPR.” To which I was exacerbated and ended the conversation because the was no fruit.
This morning, as I almost always do, I reflect in conversations that I have to evaluate my thinking. Was I right in saying something? Should I reevaluate my perspective? What are actually the facts of the matter? Was the manner in which I communicated, friendly or even useful? What was I trying to accomplish?
I recognized the guy I was speaking with and I even knew his name. Very pleasant guy and we have had random chit chat conversations in the past. Started with primarily a conversation about interest rates, with him sharing some rates his family had experienced and I with my current house which I had bought within the last year. I’m rather not pleased with interest rates and expressed the resemblance to years long gone by where rates were going up up up. At the writing of this article, in prime real estate it’s high 7’s and even 8 and up, depending on the investment. My friend then said, yeah, we won’t see interest rates low like we did only a couple years ago, for a long time, or something to that effect. But this is where I revealed all my cards in one statement… “I bet if Trump were to be elected again, he would turn the interest rates back down.”. That’s what set the trajectory of our conversation to crap.
My mistake.
Be that at it may. I am still going to go through and evaluate the conversation…
First, I should have tested the waters for political leanings, without something as inflammatory as mentioning Trump’s name. Sets people off in a weird way sometimes. Short answer to myself, be patient and don’t assume that everyone in “small-town USA” is going to support former Republican presidents. Truth be told, I am less fond of some of the former Republican presidents now, than I ever was. But ironically, I voted independent, up until Obama. Fun fact. Also, another fun fact, Trump wasn’t who I voted for in the primaries, leading up to his initial presidency.
Back to how I responded… When my friend told me that NPR was his source, I responded very poorly. I didn’t start calling him names, but I scoffed for sure. That was a big woops moment for me. I owe him an apology for that, to be sure. I did go to shake his hand, to which he looked me in the face and shook my hand as well… But it was not the way I like to end conversations at all. I screwed up.
What was I trying to accomplish? Looking back, and for some odd reason, I just assumed the man I was speaking with would find it, at the very least, mildly humorous or entertaining to suggest that Trump could turn things around with interest rates. Nope. Conversation went tilt, from then on. I will need to address at some point.
Now to the meat of the factoids my friend presented… Beginning with the tax cuts mostly benefitting the tip 1%.
(Su_quote) Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont appeared at a CNN presidential town hall Monday night. After his first question from the audience, Sanders argued that President Donald Trump “said he’d have a tax plan to benefit the middle class, but 83% of the benefits go to the 1%.”
CNN states, (su_quote)Facts First:This isn’t true right now, but if certain tax cuts are not extended it will be the case in 2027, according to the Tax Policy Center.
2027. Ok. So, technically, Trump did Not cut taxes primarily for the rich. But let’s read more from CNN.
The tax reform passed in December 2017 included tax cuts for corporations as well as individuals – but while the benefits for business were permanent, the individual taxpayer cuts will expire by 2027. If Congress does nothing to extend them, the top 1% will at that point receive roughly 83% of the tax cut benefits, according to estimates from the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center.
The same study said that for the 2018 tax year, the top 1% would receive 20.5% of the benefits from the tax cuts.
Why the 10-year timeline? That’s thanks to Senate rules that allow tax cuts to pass with fewer than 60 votes if they won’t increase the deficit in 10 years – a necessity for Republicans to get the tax reform through.
But it’s possible that a future Congress and President would vote to extend Trump’s tax cuts – even if Democrats are in charge. A vast majority of the last major round of tax cuts passed by President George W. Bush were made permanent under President Barack Obama.
Who else was talking about Trump’s Tax Cuts for the 1%?
I’ve been asked many times, “If God is a loving and moral God, why is there so much pain, suffering and evil in this world?”
How do you answer such an impossible question.
The atheistic answer seems clear enough. First, there is no God. And second, we are largely pre-disposed to just do what we do, with no free will, because our minds are simply chemical reactions to external stimuli.
But that doesn’t really satisfy the intellect, does it?
The atheist will then ask, why did God create war and famine and killing and and and… ?!? All the while, they presuppose, there is no God and there is no free will. But… IF God did give humanity free-will, then the atheist will be put back on their heels and here’s why.
Christians believe God gave humanity free-will. What that means is that Christians, by their very nature will take responsibility for their own actions, KNOWING that they sin and KNOWING that they are in fact the ones that MADE THE CHOICE to do really terrible things. God allows it. That’s a tough position to hold to, but that doesn’t make God bad, it makes God loving. He allows us to live freely, with the hopes that we would seek to know him.
The atheists position however suggests that they didn’t have a choice in the matter and so sin, in and of itself is a moot point and doesn’t exist. I don’t know about you, but I had a choice to write this piece about how atheists, when they actually take accountability for their own actions and accept there is a higher morality than their very own subjective point of view, will actually come face-to-face with their creator, who is Jesus. Hard pill to swallow, but that’s just the way it goes.
What does this look like? The little girl seems a bit awkward here. I’ll admit it’s a snapshot, so I included the entire video here.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TwGZctJxbrE
The little boy here, with his stuffed animal is very excited to see the guy come out and dance and get on the ground as he collects dollars from people.
Wearing women’s panties for all to see. And the dancer was up above the child just a few moments ago.
The second guy is dressed up and not exposing anything. It’s rather benign. But here is the same little girl a few minutes later
If that’s mom, then she’s enjoying this. The “dad” or whoever he is to the little girl, doesn’t look exactly on-board in the first clip. But, maybe he’s good with this too. The second guy is dressed up and not exposing anything
This is some guys just having fun at the same event. And yes, it is two guys. The video makes it clear.
Are we supposed to support this behavior out in public for all to see? What is the limit? Should there be a limit? They are teaching the touching of others in elementary school now. I’m not ok with that. It was just earlier today that I got someone posting in this same thread complaining about Catholic priests touching little boys. Two ships passing one another in the night it seems…
Biden chastised Trump for Trump having Classified documents at his house in Maro Lago.
https://youtu.be/tMuFCdrwJRU
Biden asked by Peter Doocy, “You have Classified material next to your Corvette?” Biden responds, “My Corvette’s in a locked garage, not like it was out in the street.”
https://youtu.be/FXSyIfPpRoE
What do you do with this kind of information? Some will say, well, I like Biden, so it’s ok for him. Others will say they hate Trump, so it’s one standard for one and not for the other. And yet others will perhaps change their tune about Trump on yet another hyped up charge against him. We’ll see.
Was reading up on chickens being butchered at only 47 days old in the U.S. for their meat. These are still essentially baby chickens. They are locked up in tight quarters, they are fed all day long, then they are “Live-Shackle Slaughtered,” which means they are handcuffed (feet cuffed) hung upside down, run through electrified water to stun them and then have their throat cut and then boiled. 10
Let’s process this. Once a chicken mates, it takes about 12 days to lay a fertile egg. From the time is is laid to the time it hatches in about 23 days and then these chickens are killed on average of 47 days. So, this is 82 days since the chicken mated.
This organization has brought light to a very important subject, cruelty to living organisms. Worse yet, a very young chicken and they certainly are NOT MATURE YET. Most of them never see the light of day as they are inside for a huge majority if not all of their lives. Please note, that they are accepting your money to help in the protection of animals. That’s interesting.
Chickens are largely domesticated animals. They are not classified as a reptile which is a type of animal. Nor are they a mammal which is another type of animal. Humans however are mammals.
I’d like to compare chickens to humans real quick. From the moment a woman mates, she has about 280 days until the baby sees the light of day. That is, of course, unless a planned parenthood doctor doesn’t take their forceps with a serrated edge, sometimes called a Sopher clamp, and crush the baby’s head and then sever the limbs and pull out all the pieces, lining them up, to make sure they got the whole baby out. 13
Please note, this isn’t ALL babies. Some will just use a chemical to make it impossible for the child to feed anymore because it separates from the uterine wall, so it dies of starvation. Yet others will use a vacuum and just suck the baby parts out of the woman’s body and then scrape anything left off the wall of the woman’s uterus.
Now, I will grant you, 65% of all abortions are done by the 63rd day of pregnancy. But what this also means is that 35% of abortions are done from the 64th day to the actual day of birth. But another way to look at it, is that 88% of abortions are done in the first trimester, which means by the 83rd day. 14
Quick comparison:
Chickens killed by the 82nd day and tortured up to death.
Human babies are mostly killed, 88%, before the 83rd day in an equally torturous way.
And then, here’s the kicker. Planned Parenthood was confirmed by the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals to have been harvesting organs. Planned Parenthood did not deny any of the footage revealing this information as evidence in the case. 15
Politico said the “videos were manipulated.”
New York Times said the “videos were altered.”
Huffington Post said the “videos were totally manipulated… and misleadingly altered.”
However the court saw through the nonsense and hypocrisy. My question is. Do you?
I’m not saying the treatment of the chickens is bad or good. But there are sure a lot of people supporting the treatment of unborn babies. If you are one of those people who say it’s terrible that 82 day old chickens dying this way is bad, then why is an 82 day old baby less bad?
